![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
| Off-topic discussion Talk about anything unrelated to Naruto! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | ||||||
|
Custom Title
Kage (影)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Where you least expect me o_O
Posts: 3,264
iTrader: (0)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well I was looking some of these up and so was Knightmare and they are just either Hilarious, Confusing, Awesome.
![]() So if you have any cool Frases;Paradox's;Quotes or anything similar post them here! ![]() Here are some I found : |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||||||
|
All Seeing Geass
Ichibi (一尾の守鶴)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,015
iTrader: (0)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Here's some paradoxes.. most of them get you thinking.
Barber paradox: The adult male barber who shaves all men who do not shave themselves, and no one else. Can he shave himself? (Russell's popularisation of his set theoretic paradox.) Berry paradox: The phrase "the first number not nameable in under ten words" appears to name it in nine words. Curry's paradox: "If this sentence is true, the world will end in a week." Epimenides paradox: A Cretan says: "All Cretans are liars". Exception paradox: "If there is an exception to every rule, then every rule must have at least one exception, the exception to this one being that it has no exception." Grelling-Nelson paradox: Is the word "heterological", meaning "not applicable to itself," a heterological word? Intentionally blank page: Many documents contain pages on which the text "This page is intentionally left blank" is printed, thereby making the page not blank. Liar paradox: "This sentence is false." This is the canonical self-referential paradox. Also "Is the answer to this question no?" Opposite Day: "It is opposite day today." Paradox of the Court: A law student agrees to pay his teacher after winning his first case. The teacher then sues the student (who has not yet won a case) for payment. Petronius's Paradox: "Practice moderation in all things. Including moderation." Quine's paradox: "yields a falsehood when appended to its own quotation" yields a falsehood when appended to its own quotation. Richard's paradox: We appear to be able to use simple English to define a decimal expansion in a way which is self-contradictory. Socratic paradox: "I know nothing at all." This is the best one IMO: Schrodinger's Cat paradox: If a cat is placed inside of a box and can die at any second and the observer closes it, is it alive or dead before he opens it to look? Last edited by Knightmare Zero; 05-31-2009 at 06:34 AM.. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
Custom Title
ANBU Root (暗部根)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: snuggling with my Ita~kun
Posts: 1,486
iTrader: (0)
![]() |
Ahahahahahaha Those Aussie ones were great XD
lol milk is illegal and the ones about King's Cross XD so funny. For those of you that dont know, Kings Cross is like where all the stripclubs and stuff are. Hehe...Hippo racing.... |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
The Original Femme Fatal
Kyuubi (九尾の妖狐)Kage (影)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: In Youichi Hiruma's Arms
Posts: 3,075
iTrader: (0)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
LoL the aussie stuff was brilliant, and the paradox's got my brain close to meltdown!
__________________
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||||||||
|
Custom Title
Kage (影)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: On a motorcycle, playin some card games
Posts: 2,978
iTrader: (0)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() And LOL Paradoxes make my brain die D: Quote:
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||||||||
|
Custom Title
Kage (影)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Where you least expect me o_O
Posts: 3,264
iTrader: (0)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() When the scratching stops, you know it's dead ![]() Quote:
Last edited by omega 5000; 05-31-2009 at 11:21 PM.. |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||||||||
|
Custom Title
Kage (影)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: On a motorcycle, playin some card games
Posts: 2,978
iTrader: (0)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
and yeah that cat one is pretty funny =P |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||||||
|
Senior Member
Sannin (伝説の三忍)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Moon
Posts: 2,219
iTrader: (0)
![]() ![]() ![]() |
the only difference between religion and monarchy, is that in religion no one have seen king, but belives that there is one
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||||||
|
Custom Title
ANBU (暗部)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,070
iTrader: (0)
![]() ![]() |
woot schrodingers cat
explaining that one :P, it applies to quantum mechanics, you have to have a minor comprehension of quantum theory to understand it but here goes i won't explain too much here, and what i do will only be skimming the surface, but in quantum mechanics, things can apparently be in multiple states (such as multiple positions at once), and it's all based on probability. I.e, an electron can be here, or there, or in both places at once (their is a confusing double slit experiment that explains the shocking reality of this, which i could try to explain to you, but I would do a mediocre job at it and it would only confuse everyone further). Their is alot more too it then that, but if i go any further il open a pandora's box of explanations and various interpretations of what it all means. so schrodinger proposed if you put a cat in a box with poison that is set to release when a radioactive isotope decay. As a result, the cat is "entangled" with the radioactive isotope, because it's decay means the cat will die, similar to 2 entangled particles or a particle in entangled superpositions (2 states at once). What is the condition of the cat? because radioactive decay is based on probability, we can never be sure when that specific sample has decayed. Therefore their is a certain probability that the cat is dead, or alive, or both at the same time. It is in superposition of these 3 possibilities, However the concept of being both dead and alive at the same time is utterly ridiculous, and we know that it can't really happen. So this whole thing was schrodinger's stab at "Quantum Weirdness" (Keep in mind schrodinger's contributions to quantum mechanics were immense and he was among the most important of physicists in the field) I believe that physicists eventually resolved this with "decoherence" which PRETTY MUCH (this isn't precise) states that entanglement doesn't apply in the macroscopic world due to the immense number of entanglements going on i.e one atom would be entangled to a thousand different atoms, therefore it demonstrating the effects of a single one of these entanglements would be nearly impossible. A book i read compared it to you or I "unshuffling" a deck of cards except extremely more difficult. keep in mind this is rough as i was in a rush, but that's the jist of it,
__________________
Last edited by aceshigh212; 05-31-2009 at 06:11 PM.. |
||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| funny phrases, paradox, questions, quotes |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|
|